Posted by: Jerry Garrett | January 16, 2017

January 16, 1942: Did A New Moon Kill Actress Carole Lombard?


Searchers comb wreckage of TWA Flight 3 (AP archives)


Did pitch-black skies, on the night of a new moon, lead to one of the most notorious aviation disasters in history? The new moon was not mentioned as a factor in the exhaustive investigation and subsequent report on the crash. Was it even considered?

Here are the facts; you be the judge:

At 7:20 p.m. on January 16, 1942, Transcontinental & Western Airlines Flight #3 flew straight into the face of Mount Potosi near Las Vegas at a speed of about 200 m.p.h. The plane, a twin-engine, propeller driven Douglas DC-3, disintegrated on impact, killing all 22 people onboard, including actress Carole Lombard, the wife of film star Clark Gable.

The accident seemed mysterious and prompted an intense investigation into every possible explanation for it. One factor ruled out was the “entirely satisfactory” weather conditions that night. But that conclusion is wrong, I believe, as was the decision to blame the pilot, Capt. Wayne C. Williams.lombardLAT

Let’s look at what happened:

The New York to Los Angeles flight was many hours late, after making unscheduled stops to take on cargo and on troops in transit to the west coast. It made a refueling stop in Albuquerque, New Mexico, three hours behind schedule. The plane should have been able to fly nonstop to Los Angeles (Burbank airport, actually) from that point, but headwinds were vicious – so strong, in fact, additional stops had to be scheduled in Winslow, Arizona, and Las Vegas to take on enough fuel to make it. So the struggling flight was falling even further behind.

The flight plan called for landing at an airstrip near Boulder City, Nevada. But the plane arrived in Las Vegas well after sunset (which had been at 4:52 p.m. that night). The Boulder City field had no landing lights, so the plane was rerouted, 18 miles further on, to the lighted strip at McCarran Field.

When the flight resumed at 7:07 p.m., the original flight plan and compass headings were retained, as though the plane was still being routed from Boulder City. A cruising altitude of about 7,500 feet above sea level, leaving the Vegas area from that airport, would have been fine for a 218-degree heading to Burbank. But the plane took off 18 miles farther west, and that was enough of a difference to route the plane directly on a deadly collision course with the summit of 8,500-foot Mount Potosi.

So, why couldn’t the pilot, an experienced flyer, see a massive 8,500-foot mountain, directly in front of him? After all the night was clear and cold, investigators noted, with “ceiling and visibility unlimited”!

The answer is visibility was not “unlimited”. The pilot, in fact, could not see a thing. It was the night of the new moon.


Mount Potosi’s snow cover on January 16, 2017 (Jerry Garrett)

Often, in January, the heights of Mount Potosi would stand out with brilliant bright new snow (see photo). But not that night in January of 1942; Mount Potosi’s summit had received only a smattering of snow. Vegas Valley weather records show no measurable precipitation fell the whole month of January.

Another consideration: Las Vegas was just a tiny desert watering hole back then, with a population of less than 8,500 (compared to 2 million in the valley today); so there were no “bright lights of the Vegas Strip” to cast a glow that night. There were no bright lights then; and no “Strip”.

The pilot should have been able to utilize navigation beacons in the area to help him make out silhouettes of terrain at night. But, that night, all but one of the five navigation beacons around the Las Vegas area had been turned off. Why? Because of (unfounded) fears of a Japanese attack on the west coast (the Pearl Harbor attack had been only five weeks earlier).

So the pilot, after climbing from the airport runway’s elevation of 1,900 feet to slightly above his prescribed cruising altitude of 7,500 feet (actually he got to about 7,700 feet), leveled off. He thought he was in the clear.

He almost was.

In fact he was just 80 feet short of clearing a low section of ridge, directly in front of him. If he had been able to see it, he might have been able to pull up just enough in time. Instead, he unwittingly flew straight into an unseen vertical rock cliff.


Clark Gable & Carole Lombard (AP)

Miss Lombard shouldn’t even have been on that plane; she had been scheduled to take the train home from Indiana after a charitable tour raising money for war bonds. But she hopped on the flight instead, in hopes of getting back to her husband sooner.

The official crash report , which brushed off any atmospheric factors, blamed pilot error. But the co-pilot had been the one who filled out the faulty flight plan, and forgot to fix it. Silly bureaucrats shouldn’t have turned off the navigation beacons in a location hundreds of miles beyond the range of any Japanese military aircraft. And, in any event, that flight shouldn’t have been operating at night – especially flying blind on the night of the new moon.

(Editor’s Note: A plaque marks the spot of the plane’s impact nowadays; but the area is so rugged and generally inaccessible many parts of the wreckage, including landing gear and an engine, have never been recovered.)

Jerry Garrett

January 16, 2017






  1. Jerry, I have some information about the Carole Lombard crash that might be interesting to add to the story.

    My Dad, Rufus W. Davis, flew that same plane on that same route many times for TWA. There was a peculiarity of the beacons that no one ever mentions in discussing the crash. A peculiarity that if overlooked, would cause a pilot to fly right into that mountain just as happened on this trip. Dad suspects that the Captain had been out of the cockpit at a critical moment and the less experienced co-pilot wasn’t aware of (or paying attention to) this hazard. Dad knew that particular Captain personally and was pretty sure the captain would not have made this error, but with a major celebrity on board, the captain may have been visiting in the cabin and left the copilot in charge of the cockpit at the critical time that the beacon anomaly proved fatal.

    Dad wrote about this and tried to get a reporter who would follow up but wasn’t able to do this before he died at 93 after 46 years in the cockpit with TWA.

    Let me know if you’d be interested in talking about this

    Jaime Davis

    • I’d certainly like to know more. Very interesting. Anything you could add to this story, I would be very appreciative to know.

  2. Jerry,

    You have a nice write up about the accident, but there are a few factual key points missing from the story that I have gained from 30 some years of research on the subject. If you are interested I can share them with you if you like.

    Mike McComb

    • Love to hear your insights. Thanks for writing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: